Seattle building reporting

Seattle BEPS versus annual energy benchmarking: two separate requirements

Compare Seattle's annual energy benchmarking requirement with periodic BEPS verification, greenhouse-gas reporting, professional roles, and later emissions targets.

Do not merge the deadlinesSeattle annual energy benchmarking remains due June 1 each year. BEPS uses separate size-based reporting years, professional roles, and later emissions-target obligations.
How to use this guide

Verify the exact scope.

Seattle annual energy benchmarking and the Building Emissions Performance Standard both use building data, but they are not the same program. Benchmarking maintains an annual Portfolio Manager energy record. BEPS adds periodic verification, greenhouse-gas reporting, and later emissions targets or allowed alternative paths for covered buildings.

The overlap can create procurement mistakes. A building owner may hire support for annual benchmarking and still need a separate Qualified Person or entity for BEPS verification. The proposal should name the program, reporting period, portal, responsible person, and deliverable for every task.

Two-track comparison

Keep the recurring data work separate from BEPS reporting.

Coordinate the records, but preserve the distinct deadlines, roles, and evidence required by each program.

01

Annual energy benchmarking

Covered Seattle buildings over 20,000 square feet report energy performance each year through Portfolio Manager. Define account ownership, meters, utility data, property details, corrections, annual submission, and owner handoff.

02

First BEPS reporting interval

Covered buildings follow size-based 2027–2030 reporting dates for benchmarking verification and a greenhouse-gas report. A Qualified Person and the city's independence rule affect the scope.

03

Later BEPS target intervals

Later compliance intervals add greenhouse-gas intensity targets or allowed alternative pathways. Do not bundle future planning or implementation into the first report unless the owner wants that work now.

04

Washington remains a third track

Washington Clean Buildings is a state energy-performance program with separate requirements, portal work, and deadlines. Completing one Seattle requirement does not automatically complete the state program.

Common questions

Understand the service before comparing firms.

Short answers grounded in public program and federal guidance. The written scope still controls each engagement.

Does a successful annual benchmarking report complete BEPS?

No. The programs are connected but separate. BEPS adds periodic benchmarking verification, greenhouse-gas reporting, and later target obligations under its own schedule and professional rules.

Seattle BEPS FAQsReview BEPS deadlines

When is Seattle annual benchmarking due?

Seattle publishes June 1 as the annual reporting deadline for covered nonresidential and multifamily buildings over 20,000 square feet. Check the current building record and instructions before filing.

Seattle energy benchmarking

Does Seattle BEPS satisfy Washington Clean Buildings?

No. Seattle describes BEPS as an emissions standard and Washington Clean Buildings as an energy standard. They are separate laws with separate deadlines and requirements.

Seattle BEPS FAQsReview the state boundary
Before hiring

Questions worth asking every finalist.

  1. Which exact program, reporting period, building record, deadline, and portal does the proposal address?
  2. Who owns and maintains Portfolio Manager, and who performs BEPS benchmarking verification?
  3. Who is the named Qualified Person, and which greenhouse-gas reporting work is included?
  4. Which corrections, owner reviews, submissions, editable files, and proof of completion will be delivered?
  5. Which later emissions-target, alternative-path, audit, design, or implementation services are separate?
Primary source

Confirm the requirement before choosing help.

This directory is independent and cannot determine what a particular building must do.

Seattle BEPS FAQs