Benchmarking and data cleanup
Start here when the immediate need is ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager setup, utility-data access, building-detail corrections, annual reporting, or a reliable energy-use baseline.
Understand the practical difference between energy audits, commissioning, building tune-ups, benchmarking, controls work, and operations planning before contacting providers.
Building-performance services overlap, but they do not solve the same problem. An energy audit can identify and evaluate opportunities; commissioning can investigate how systems actually operate; benchmarking organizes energy-use data; a tune-up follows a defined operations-focused process; and controls or HVAC work may be the direct path when the problem is already known.
Start with the decision or problem in front of you. Then describe the building, deadline, systems, available records, and result you need. A provider can propose a more useful scope when the desired outcome is clearer than a technical label.
These categories are starting points, not rigid boundaries. A project may need more than one service, but each proposal should state which problem it addresses, what work is included, and what the owner receives.
Start here when the immediate need is ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager setup, utility-data access, building-detail corrections, annual reporting, or a reliable energy-use baseline.
Use an audit when you need a building-wide opportunity assessment, energy and cost analysis, compliance-supporting documentation, or a prioritized capital and operating plan.
Use commissioning when equipment, controls, sequences, or system interactions may not be performing as intended and you need investigation, testing, issue tracking, and verification.
Use a tune-up provider when a Seattle requirement or a defined operations-and-maintenance review is driving the work. Confirm the building cycle, systems, corrections, and reporting responsibility.
Go directly to a technical or implementation specialist when the affected system or project is already known and the need is design, repair, integration, replacement, optimization, or ongoing service.
Start with O&M planning when the building needs repeatable procedures, roles, schedules, documentation, training, or an energy-management process that staff can maintain.
Short answers grounded in public program and federal guidance. The written scope still controls each engagement.
No. An energy audit generally identifies and evaluates energy-saving opportunities. Commissioning investigates and verifies how building systems and operating sequences perform. A building can benefit from both, but the written scopes should separate the responsibilities and deliverables.
No. Benchmarking is the annual process of measuring and reporting building energy use. Seattle Building Tune-Ups use a defined process to assess and correct building operations and maintenance issues.
Yes. Some firms publish several connected capabilities, while others specialize narrowly. Ask which tasks are performed directly, which are subcontracted, how independence is handled, and whether later design or construction is optional.
There is no single answer for every building. The required pathway can involve benchmarking, energy-management and operations documents, audits, reporting, exemptions, or efficiency measures. Confirm the building’s requirements with Washington Commerce before selecting a provider scope.
This directory is independent and cannot determine what a particular building must do.